I do take offence to that above statement (top one). I do not feel that ease of use is one of the main reasons most people use a crossbow over a vertical bow. Many on here shot both bows, the crossbow as well as the compound or recurve or longbow. Ease of use is am important factor but not the main reason. I believe that it is shooters choice that is the reason people shoot crossbows. Others need the crossbow because they can no longer bshoot the vertical bows or be proficiant enough with them. Hunting with archery equipment is not just shooting the tool, but the necessity to get close to the animal (within 30-40 yards) does not matter what tool you are using, that fact remains the same.designer 2 wrote: I know people will say, If you do not take the time to learn, practice, etc., you do not belong in the woods. Well, you would be right. BUT, that will never be. People will ALWAYS gravitate towards the "Easy Button".
Not to be sacastic, but isn't that one of the main reasons most people use a crossbow over a vertical bow?
jh45gun:
"Do we really need it?"
I must ask you.
Did we really need the compound bow over the recurve?
Did we really need a rifled barrel over the smooth bore?
Did we really need a percussion cap over the flint lock?
I know, enough already with the "Did we's"
I hope you get my point that progress always progresses.
I like my electric lights. Do not wish to light my house with candles.
Thanks
With that following (above) dirrected towards jh45gun, it shows us you do not really understand us or our feeling towards this.
Did we really need the compound bow over the recurve?
Did we really need a rifled barrel over the smooth bore?
Did we really need a percussion cap over the flint lock?
now a few did or do we ? from me
Well unfortantly there is a limit on what is needed and for what is pratical. I personally believe that with the shorter BOLT it will get serious opisition from people and government.do we need fully automatic weapons to hunt with
do we need handgernades (spelling) to hunt with
do we need the 50 cal snipper weapon for 1 mile hunting shots
Now to your comment to me:
Unfortantly it will cost you a cent, it will actually cost you alot of money if you have any money invested into this product. If you have loans invested into this, then you are charged intrest, and if you have actuall money invested, then you are losing the intrest involved. Untill you can go into full production with a large quanity of product that keeps the money revolving through the door (money working for you, instead of just sitting there) it will cost you money.As far as rulings, it will not costs me a cent. When people vote, I will not be charged. That's a freebee.
To say it's not for you - You have not tried it or seen it in person - or seen what a production bow will do. Bottom line is; as hunters in a given field, ie. guns, bows, spears, whatever, it is our responsibilty to be as humane as possible.
Now about what is for me and what is not for me. I have not fired an automatic weapon and I know that it is not for me. It just does not interest me to hunt with one of them or the other "did or do we ?'s" I asked.
Oh yea, by the way on accuracy. I shoot the Relayer 150lb (over 22 years old) and I get 1 inch groops at 40 yards (did it just yeaterday) with hunting heads on the arrow. Actually my hunting heads are on the front of the arrow, not the back like you suggested




