ROFLOL!!!GaryL wrote:Nightmares never leave A.W. so the answer is NOA.W wrote:Me too.
Does this mean that GaryL has to stop picking on me?
The EXCALIBUR FORUM POSTER'S PLEDGE ... Sign On!
Moderator: Excalibur Marketing Dude
-
Highlander
- Posts: 160
- Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2006 7:40 am
- Location: Central, Ontario
-
Grizzly Adam
- Posts: 5701
- Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 8:36 pm
- Location: Decatur County, Indiana
-
northbaydude
- Posts: 37
- Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 2:47 pm
- Location: North Bay Ontario Canada
- Contact:
-
(THE BLUE STAR)
- Posts: 424
- Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2003 1:41 pm
- Location: Three-Rivers -Quebec Canada
- Contact:
With respect, the people who are willing to pledge aren't going to be the ones who are troublemakers anyway.
A pledge here from a troublemaker isn't worth the paper it's written on.
If I could keep a pledge, it would be that I would lose 20 pounds, never stare at a pretty woman, drive within the speed limit, get to work earlier each day, and most important, exercise more frequently.
A pledge here from a troublemaker isn't worth the paper it's written on.
If I could keep a pledge, it would be that I would lose 20 pounds, never stare at a pretty woman, drive within the speed limit, get to work earlier each day, and most important, exercise more frequently.
"Gun Control Laws"--trying to nag criminals into submission.
-
Leonard Hawkins
- Posts: 218
- Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 6:22 pm
- Location: Lewisburg Ohio
- Contact:
-
Grizzly Adam
- Posts: 5701
- Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 8:36 pm
- Location: Decatur County, Indiana
Hi5 said: "With respect, the people who are willing to pledge aren't going to be the ones who are troublemakers anyway. A pledge here from a troublemaker isn't worth the paper it's written on." ____________________________________________
I understand what you're saying, Hi5, and agree that a dishonest agreement means nothing ... but, I say (with the same respect for you) that the value of such a pledge is not in securing the reform of "troublemakers," but rather in cementing the solidarity of those who agree on the foundations of respectful exchange between members.
Our US Constitution is a good example; the signatures of dishonest rabblerousers wouldn't have signified anything ... but the collective agreement of those who meant what they said stood for a great deal, and still does today.
Our little "document" pales in comparison; but such efforts are nonetheless important! Union advances the cause.
As we assume you agree in principle, then, I'll sign you up by proxy:
Hi5
____________________________________________I understand what you're saying, Hi5, and agree that a dishonest agreement means nothing ... but, I say (with the same respect for you) that the value of such a pledge is not in securing the reform of "troublemakers," but rather in cementing the solidarity of those who agree on the foundations of respectful exchange between members.
Our US Constitution is a good example; the signatures of dishonest rabblerousers wouldn't have signified anything ... but the collective agreement of those who meant what they said stood for a great deal, and still does today.
Our little "document" pales in comparison; but such efforts are nonetheless important! Union advances the cause.
As we assume you agree in principle, then, I'll sign you up by proxy:
Hi5
Grizz
