


Our local DNR generally reports that the deer harvest is normally down in years with great mast because deer don't have to travel very far for food. This leads to less deer movement and therefore less sightings by hunters. I understand their logic, but I think locations can have unique circumstances. For instance, I normally have plenty of corn fields within a mile of my stand. The deer spend a lot of time in those fields when the mast is poor until the crops are cut. I've went weeks without a sighting in the woods. When there is good mast, I may get to see them in the woods before the rut. I can hope anyway.
DuckHunt
