Range Finder or Night Vision

Crossbow Hunting

Moderator: Excalibur Marketing Dude

Post Reply
Mighty Mooser
Posts: 309
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2003 9:30 pm
Location: Lunenburg, On

Range Finder or Night Vision

Post by Mighty Mooser »

My wife asked what I would like for my Birthday, and I gave her these 2 choices, I can't decide which is best to get around $200 to $300?
I hunt Deer Crossbow, Shotgun, muzzleloader, I hunt moose with rifle.

On the one hand the night vision would be good scouting at night for those nocturnal buggers, but the rangefinder can be used durring hunting situations.

Any thoughts on which one and why?
When you whack them you better stack them!!!
Pydpiper
Posts: 6148
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 4:56 pm
Location: Woodstock, Brantford'ish, ON
Contact:

Post by Pydpiper »

If it is of any value to you the Bushnell range finder is on sale at Canadian Tire right now. I couldn't imagine hunting without one.
If you are not willing to learn, nobody can help you, if you are willing, nobody can stop you.
A bowhunter with a passion for shooting firearms.
WMU 91
Boo string
User avatar
Boo
Posts: 14322
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 11:04 pm
Location: Newtonville, Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Post by Boo »

You don't need either. I have one but rarely use it. A range finder is nice when hunting in unfamiliar areas. I know a guy how shot a fox at almost 100 yards without a range finder! It was his first time using the thing but managed a perfect shot!
Pass on the night vision. Save that for the wish list after you have everything and you become a true head hunter.
Some people just like stepping on rakes
awshucks
Posts: 5238
Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2006 6:40 am
Location: arkansas

Post by awshucks »

rf for me. It's legal here to hunt yote at night and hogs at night in Tx so I got a red lens light that mounts on my scope from Cabelas for around $70. Does the job just fine at a fraction of the cost of night vision.
"Eze 18:21"
Horizontal Hunter
Posts: 1050
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 4:13 pm
Location: Western Massachusetts

Post by Horizontal Hunter »

I am not good at judging yardage and I know it, so I have a Bushnell Yardage Pro 450 and I can't imagine hunting without it.

Bob
Vegetarian: vejiˈte(ə)rēən/noun: old Indian word for lousy hunter.
Excalibur Exocet, GT Laser II, 2" Bhoning Blazers 125g NAP Spitfire
User avatar
wabi
Posts: 13443
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 9:21 pm
Location: Ohio

Post by wabi »

Unless you're going to spend really big $$$$$ on nightvision it isn't really much good. I have a low-priced night vision monocular made in Russia and it's very limited on range with poor clarity. You can tell it's a deer at 80 or 100 yards, but forget counting points on the antlers. It's fun to take along at dusk to see how many are waiting for full darkness to come out into the fields, but isn't really of any use for hunting unless you plan to poach them.
The rangefinder is useful with a crossbow. It's good to range various landmarks around your stand or blind so you know the approximate range if a deer shows up. I like to range landmarks near my maximum range then I can know if a deer is "shootable" or not. I hunt a lot at one location (food plot) and I even drive stakes for markers at my maximum range. You can do it without a rangefinder, but it is easier with one, and it's fun to guess ranges then read the real distance to improve your skill.
wabi
ranger
Posts: 424
Joined: Sat Jun 16, 2007 10:51 pm
Location: DENT,Mn.

Post by ranger »

I have a pair of type 2 N V ,they were fun when I got them(1,200.00)but the novilty has worn off, I used them to watch the beaver at night in the pond,it made it easyer to trap them.
Anyway I have a pair of yardage pro's that I use when I move my stand or change ground blind set up.....
Y25, Axiom SMF
Matrix 380 Blackout
Turbo XLT. Stealth SS
Mission MXB 360
Free Men Dont Ask To Bear Arms.
Rick Teal
Posts: 118
Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2002 2:20 am
Location: Manotick Ontario, Canada

Post by Rick Teal »

I'd go range finder all the way. The night vision is a nice toy to play with, but the range finder has an immediate and practical application - both in hunting and target shooting.
I hunt, therefore I am.
Pydpiper
Posts: 6148
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 4:56 pm
Location: Woodstock, Brantford'ish, ON
Contact:

Post by Pydpiper »

Boo wrote:I know a guy how shot a fox at almost 100 yards without a range finder! It was his first time using the thing but managed a perfect shot!
A fox? I am surprised he hasn't mentioned it.. :D
If you are not willing to learn, nobody can help you, if you are willing, nobody can stop you.
A bowhunter with a passion for shooting firearms.
WMU 91
Boo string
LV2HNT
Posts: 394
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 11:48 am
Location: Woodbridge VA

Post by LV2HNT »

I agree that a range finder is more practical. I have a night vision monocular, and it is fun to play with but not usefull because by law I can't have one with me while hunting. I would sugest checking your local regulations if you allready havn't.
A bad day in the woods is better than a good day anywhere else.
Sierra
Posts: 91
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Lock, Ohio

Post by Sierra »

Go with the range finder.

I've had a Lecia for 5 years and it has paid off during big game hunts, bow & gun, and also for taking varmints & smaller game out past 500 yards. The range finder has also helped me judge distances when without it.

My son and I have made a game out of quessing distance to an object then using the laser to verify the distance. My son usually bests me at quessing.
2006 Exocet 200
3x ProView Scope
85 grain NAP Thunderhead
Wolverine Hunter 20" CrossBolts
Original Stock String
Bolt Speed 320 fps
Pydpiper
Posts: 6148
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 4:56 pm
Location: Woodstock, Brantford'ish, ON
Contact:

Post by Pydpiper »

To muddy the waters a little more, I just seen the mono night vision on sale at Wall-Mart for $200.. :D

A rangefinder is synonymous with archery..
If you are not willing to learn, nobody can help you, if you are willing, nobody can stop you.
A bowhunter with a passion for shooting firearms.
WMU 91
Boo string
Post Reply