Help on FPS loss by grs of weight

Crossbow Hunting

Moderator: Excalibur Marketing Dude

Post Reply
vixenmaster
Posts: 13618
Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2005 3:51 pm
Location: Western Ky

Help on FPS loss by grs of weight

Post by vixenmaster »

so what is the newest formula for figuring weight by grs per loss of speed i read years ago it was 1 fps loss for every 10 grs of weight added. would like to know ? if its 3 fps then my vixen shooting 650 gr arrows shoots 180 fps. actually using the 3 fps deal i am getting 171 fps. its so slow i may have to retire it from hunting.
Last edited by vixenmaster on Tue Jan 27, 2009 10:53 am, edited 1 time in total.
Half Bubble Off BD360

[email protected] 417-505-9315
crazyfarmer
Posts: 5250
Joined: Wed May 24, 2006 10:21 pm
Location: Virginia
Contact:

Re: Help on FPS loss by grs of weight

Post by crazyfarmer »

smokepolehall wrote:so what is the newest formula for figuring weight by grs per loss of speed i read years ago it was 1 fps loss for every 10 grs of weight added. would like to know ? if its 3 fps then my vixen shooting 650 gr arrows shoots 180 fps
I'd like to know also since ive never really tested fps loss by 10 grain increases :D
JRS
Posts: 391
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 8:01 pm
Location: Southern Ontario

Post by JRS »

I've always understood the accepted formula to be 1 fps change in speed for every 5-6 grains change in weight.
Normous
Posts: 8275
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 3:04 pm
Location: Windsor, Ontario.

Post by Normous »

My testing in regards testing speeds and weights using my Excalibur agree with JRS. 1 fps for every +/- 5 grains.
Last edited by Normous on Tue Jan 27, 2009 3:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
EXCALFFLICTION 1991 ->>----------> 2024
Matrix 355
Huskemaw and Leupold crossbow optics.
Boo Strings
SWAT BH's and TOTA heads.
Teach Your Family How To Hunt So You Don't Have To Hunt For Your Family
Michael Stogre
Posts: 220
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 10:28 am
Location: Espanola, Ontario
Contact:

Post by Michael Stogre »

Through my prochrono pal the loss is 5 feet per second for every 25 grain increase in weight. Or as some put it, 1 ft per second for every 5 grains of wt.
I would like to live like a river flows
Surprised by its own unfolding.
(John O'Donohue)
shafferm
Posts: 301
Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 7:04 pm
Location: Mason, Michigan

Post by shafferm »

Smoke,

I am not saying that it will be 3fps loss for every 10grs increase, I was trying to figure out why the posts on arrow weights being around 500grs total seemed to be the "sweetest" shooting weight. In order to get the math model for kinetic energy being maximized at this weight I used that as an approximate value and it matched up fairly nicely. It looks like that value may be closer to somewhere between 2 and 3 fps loss for every 10grs.

-M
vixenmaster
Posts: 13618
Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2005 3:51 pm
Location: Western Ky

Post by vixenmaster »

i under stood your post. sorry if i didn't state my ? right. i am asking what the latest formula was. as they seem to changed it. so the 1 fps = 10 gr is out the door. the new one is 5 gr = 1 fps loss in speed. ah so now i have went from 171 fps up to 204 fps. its above 200 fps so look out slow footed deer my vixen will clobber the slow one's! :lol:
Half Bubble Off BD360

[email protected] 417-505-9315
Woody Williams
Posts: 6440
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 5:07 pm

Post by Woody Williams »

JRS wrote:I've always understood the accepted formula to be 1 fps change in speed for every 5-6 grains change in weight.
Ditto...
Woody Williams

We have met the enemy and he is us - Pogo Possum

Hunting in Indiana at [size=84][color=Red][b][url=http://huntingindiana.proboards52.com]HUNT-INDIANA[/url][/b][/color][/size]
User avatar
Big John
Posts: 3119
Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 9:29 pm
Location: Niagara Region

m

Post by Big John »

I am believing the 1 fps. loss of speed for every 5 gr. increase to be the correct calc. seems to be the closest so far. :wink:
Phoenix - 375 gr. BEE's (babyneilsons)
Micro 315 - 410 gr. Zombies/Lumenoks
Micro 355. - Punisher-Zombies/Lumenoks

Arrowmaker - Retired
[email protected]
bomtek44
Posts: 44
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 7:01 pm
Location: SW VA

Post by bomtek44 »

smokepolehall,

I have some recent figures as follows from my 225 pound Exomax with the Excel String (28 strands) and cat whiskers. Some were shot on different days.

Weights are total arrow weight including field tip:

368 grains / 335 fps
390 grains / 330 fps
437 grains / 319 fps
442 grains / 317 fps
446 grains / 316 fps
472 grains / 310 fps

The best shooter so far is the 442 grain weight which is a 20 inch 2216 with solid aluminum rear insert and aluminum Satellite front insert with a 125 grain field tip or 125 grain Sonic broadhead.

Thanks,
bomtek44
steven in England
Posts: 210
Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2002 2:24 pm

Post by steven in England »

smokepolehall
The formula in not at straightforward as you think because the heavier you go the more efficient the bow is and you actually loose less fps as you add more weight. I found this out with my testing with an Exomax when I got over 1000 grains the ke was 128fp. If I based the calculation on 1fps per 5 grains it would only give me 107ke. The bow will not loose ke as you go heavier so if you look at the instruction that come with the bow the Vixen gets up to 72fp of ke with a 478 grain bolt. Based on this you will be getting at least 230 fps with a 650 grain bolt in my opinion. Hope this helps.
Forgot to add this assumes you use a fast flight string, other strings react differently.
Steven in England
Post Reply