FOC and point of impact
Moderator: Excalibur Marketing Dude
FOC and point of impact
Shot two sets of arrows today from my Phoenix, Beemans (left over from my pre roll-your- own days) and the GT's I normally practice and hunt with. Both weight the same 405 grns. But the GT's, with 110 grn brass insert, have higher FOC than the stock Beemans. Despite the same weight, the Beemans hit about 3'' higher than the GTs at 20 through 50 yards. In fact they still hit about 1.5'' higher when I added 25 grns by changing their tip. (Their FOC would still be lower than the 18% for GT's). Both arrows are fletched with 2" Blazers, both have the same shaped bullet point before and after the tip change. Hmmmmm.
-
- Posts: 5250
- Joined: Wed May 24, 2006 10:21 pm
- Location: Virginia
- Contact:
A higher FOC will cause the arrows to nosedive quicker.. which is why your GT2's hit lower
the arrow with the lower(10-12%) FOC would fly on a flatline more so out to 40 yards compared to the 18+% FOC arrows
more than likely, the Bemans probably have a 12% FOC.. the GT2's should have a 19% FOC
its nothing new, but you proved that the more FOC you have, the more drop off you will get. However, the arrows less effected by wind and twigs
the arrow with the lower(10-12%) FOC would fly on a flatline more so out to 40 yards compared to the 18+% FOC arrows
more than likely, the Bemans probably have a 12% FOC.. the GT2's should have a 19% FOC
its nothing new, but you proved that the more FOC you have, the more drop off you will get. However, the arrows less effected by wind and twigs
I quote crazyfarmer.
If you can increase your foc more of 20% you can also use shorter vanes.
I have 25% of foc and it allows me to use 1,5'' miniblazer vanes 3° inclination with eccellent result over 60y.
less than 4'' and 1/2 from the point
Also small vanes are quieter in flight, are influence less by the wind, are lighter (+ FOC).
If I should be able to increase foc more than 30%, I will use micro blazer 1''
bye
If you can increase your foc more of 20% you can also use shorter vanes.
I have 25% of foc and it allows me to use 1,5'' miniblazer vanes 3° inclination with eccellent result over 60y.
less than 4'' and 1/2 from the point
Also small vanes are quieter in flight, are influence less by the wind, are lighter (+ FOC).
If I should be able to increase foc more than 30%, I will use micro blazer 1''
bye
Last edited by ManX on Sat May 02, 2009 2:58 am, edited 2 times in total.
[img]http://i305.photobucket.com/albums/nn235/ManX850/exorealtree-1.jpg[/img] ExomanX, Meopta 3100,[url=http://www.wolfszeit.com/images/WO.Mo.09-li..JPG]Wolfszeit[/url] scope mount, produce in ManX Factory spa: shock absorbers, 48 fff , 2216xx78 27% foc
" I can learn more here in five minutes, then spending all day at Bass Pro archery shop."
Pleeease! That's no a compliment Nine out of ten clerks why offer to "help" me have never even SHOT a crossbow. ( I make it a habit to ask). Or if so, only in the back room. But I agree, there are some very knowledgeable folks who are very willing to help here.
Pleeease! That's no a compliment Nine out of ten clerks why offer to "help" me have never even SHOT a crossbow. ( I make it a habit to ask). Or if so, only in the back room. But I agree, there are some very knowledgeable folks who are very willing to help here.
Help me out a little bit here, guys. I'm feeling a bit dense this morning.
These are not the results I would have expected from this test. If the GTs with more FOC hit 3" lower at 20 yards and 3" lower at 50 yards, they sound to me as if they are flying the exact same arch as the lesser FOC arrows.
If they were nose diving faster, they would have hit 1" lower at 20 yards and 4" lower at 50, displaying a tighter or more reduced arch. So even though the point of impact is different, I would still have expected more of an arch change in the heavier FOC arrows.
Thus my dilemma.
Dave
These are not the results I would have expected from this test. If the GTs with more FOC hit 3" lower at 20 yards and 3" lower at 50 yards, they sound to me as if they are flying the exact same arch as the lesser FOC arrows.
If they were nose diving faster, they would have hit 1" lower at 20 yards and 4" lower at 50, displaying a tighter or more reduced arch. So even though the point of impact is different, I would still have expected more of an arch change in the heavier FOC arrows.
Thus my dilemma.
Dave
I noticed that also. My best guess is the higher FOC doesn't really show up in trajectory diffs at hunting ranges.These are not the results I would have expected from this test. If the GTs with more FOC hit 3" lower at 20 yards and 3" lower at 50 yards, they sound to me as if they are flying the exact same arch as the lesser FOC arrows.
If they were nose diving faster, they would have hit 1" lower at 20 yards and 4" lower at 50, displaying a tighter or more reduced arch. So even though the point of impact is different, I would still have expected more of an arch change in the heavier FOC arrows.
I benched two good arrows once at 30 yds, one w/ 100 gr point, the other w/ a 125. Both shafts were touching, I'd of bet there would have been more diff than that.
"Eze 18:21"