Rangefinders

Crossbow Hunting

Moderator: Excalibur Marketing Dude

Crispy
Posts: 851
Joined: Sat Sep 19, 2009 8:34 pm
Location: Carlisle Pa. united states
Contact:

Rangefinders

Post by Crispy »

Kinda in the market for a rangefinder,I never used one. How inportant is the angle feature on some? Does anybody use one? Not looking to break the bank but dont want a junker either. Is the bushnell(Chuck Adams edition) any good? Nikon(Archers Choice)? Any suggestions? Thanks for any info, Crispy
Fork Horn
Posts: 118
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 4:15 pm
Location: Cambridge , ON

Post by Fork Horn »

I just picked up the Bushnell yardge pro 450 for about $200+tx
I find it doesn't pickup alot of things, Like Rocks, Black block target, Some trees at under 50yrds.
I had the chance to try a friends Bushnell and it seemed to work better. His could scan and range while moving. (Not sure the model though)
The yardagepro 450 is good enough to get your basic ranges out to a 100yds.
“A hungry dog hunts best”
Lee Trevino

Every time you kill a coyote an angel gets a set of wings. OK, I made that up. But it should be the case.
Mike P
User avatar
huntone
Posts: 821
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 2:56 pm
Location: Middle Tennessee

Post by huntone »

I have the Bushnell Yardagepro Sport 450 and have no complaints what so ever.
Especially after it fell 16 ft. from my stand :oops: and it still works fine. :D
Dale

Ibex
Lumizone
Dan Miller mount
User avatar
ger34
Posts: 86
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2005 8:46 pm
Location: Waterloo

Re: Rangefinders

Post by ger34 »

Crispy wrote:Kinda in the market for a rangefinder,I never used one. How inportant is the angle feature on some? Does anybody use one? Not looking to break the bank but dont want a junker either. Is the bushnell(Chuck Adams edition) any good? Nikon(Archers Choice)? Any suggestions? Thanks for any info, Crispy
Crispy...just went through this same dilemna myself...and ended up with your standard run of the mill NON ANGLE COMPENSATING rangefinder...heres why

Basic Pythagoreum therom... A squared + B squared = C squared

A= distance from base of tree to target...we'll say 30 yds
B= height up tree... we'll say 20'

A= 90' (30 yds x 3'/yd)
B=20'

A squared = 8100'
B squared = 400'

so...C squared = 8500' or 92.195444...divide by 3 to get yards again....and you have 30.731 yds

I shoot an Exocet 200...415gr carbon express golt tip bolts...305 fps...with 5" plastic vanes....this ballistics calculator

http://home.att.net/~sajackson/ballistics.html

tells me that i have approx 14" drop between 30 and 40 yds...so approx .714" of vertical drop for each lineal yd to target

from base of tree to target =30 yds
from treestand 20' up to target 30.731yds...sooo...good old Pythagorus tells us we should aim as if the deer was 31 yds...so MAYBE the difference of 1" right?

Wrong....this is where it gets complicated....

Since gravity pulls straight down....Gravity...is only working on the arrow for the distance of 30yds.....not the 31yds...there is a whole mess of calculations at this point we could get into.....

but in all honesty....

The difference in drop of an arrow travelling approx 300 fps out 30yds or 31 yds....is in the neighbourhood of a 1 or 2 inches....not enough to miss the kill zone on a deer sized animal.....

Squirrels on the other hand.....are a different story
:) :)

Save the money....it doesn't effect much at bow range....

My 2 cents
Summit Viper SS
Exocet 200
Gold Tip Laser II
4" vanes
100gr G5 Montecs
dick195252
Posts: 3084
Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2007 1:57 am
Location: McEwen Tennessee

Post by dick195252 »

My third year with the {Bushnell yardage pro sport 450} no problems at all :D
Exomax, Lumizone, Boo String, NRA, ACf, Member, [Proud Grandpa!!!]
cop614
Posts: 27
Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 1:22 pm
Location: missouri

Post by cop614 »

just got a leupold rx 600 bass pro 149.00 plus shipping
User avatar
bkisel
Posts: 539
Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2009 8:49 am

Post by bkisel »

Crispy,

IMHO, if you do a lot of tree stand hunting and especially if you don't often have other trees to range on then I believe the range finders with angle compensators are worth the investment.

ger34,

You were really scaring me until seeing the smileys near the end of your post. :)


Take care...
User avatar
wabi
Posts: 13443
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 9:21 pm
Location: Ohio

Post by wabi »

I owned a Bushnell (yardage pro 450) and sold it and bought a Nikon.
After a year or so I sold the Nikon and went back to a Bushnell (yardage pro 450).
The Bushnell is a "no frills" model, but it does everything I need for hunting and does it very well.
I wouldn't buy a model endorsed by anyone, why pay them a kickback for advertising?
Right now Cabela's has the 450 on sale for $119. - can't beat that! :wink:
wabi
Gobble!
Posts: 59
Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:16 am

Post by Gobble! »

Bushnell yardge pro 450
Equinox
Vari-Zone
STS
Rage 2 Blade
sumner4991
Posts: 6989
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2006 12:16 pm

Post by sumner4991 »

I strongly suggest the use of a rangefinder. Can't tell you how many times I've misjudged yardage. On flat land, I'm pretty darn good. However, throw in some hills and valleys . . .gets tricky.

I'm actually a lot better at judging yardage now that I have a rangefinder(Nikon 440). I use it to pass the time while waiting. I also use it exclusively to zero in my scope.

I think I paid around $160 for mine . . .if I were buying today, I wouldn't spend over $125. Go to a store and look through them. The one that is easiest for you to use is the one to get.

That Bushnell deal sounds good wabi.
I'd rather wear out than rust out.
Perception trumps intention.

2006 Exomax w/Agingcrossbower Custom Stock
20" Easton Powerbolts w/125gr Trophy Ridge Stricknines & 2"Blazers
Boo Custom Strings
2006 Vixen
Missouri_Hunter
Posts: 137
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 12:54 am
Location: Florissant, Missouri

Post by Missouri_Hunter »

Just a couple of comments and my 2 cents worth....

I used a Bushnell yardage pro for many years, it did a good job...I had a chance to get a Leupold RX-II with the True Ballistic Range feature...that does the angle compensating...I think it would have cost around 300.00 but I was working at Cabelas at the time and got it for under 200.00...I like it very much, but I believe the Bushnell Yardage Pro does just just fine for a bowhunter or crossbow hunter....I do some long range shooting with my AR-15 and I think the Leopold does a slightly better job at that type of thing... :D
John Rogers
Florissant, MO
US ARMY (Retired)
[img]http://i999.photobucket.com/albums/af119/johnrogers59/HPIM0800.jpg[/img]

2006 Exocet 200, Max Zone Scope,
Groundpounder Mount, Steady Eddy
Gold Point Lazer II's, 100 gr. G5 Montecs
Crispy
Posts: 851
Joined: Sat Sep 19, 2009 8:34 pm
Location: Carlisle Pa. united states
Contact:

Post by Crispy »

Thanks for the info, I dont need all the bells and whistles on a r-finder but if it will do double duty for cbow or rifle all the better. You guys gave me some good pointers, now i need to do some homework and find a good deal! Thanks, Crispy
Chuck Gravel
Posts: 481
Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2009 12:01 am
Location: Lebanon, NJ

Post by Chuck Gravel »

I have the nikon archers choice as i only hunt with a bow but it is very nice. for what i paid it is a very nice and the angle option is very nice. sure does show a large difference from the angle compared to the norm. I would highly recommend it
Excalibur Equinox
Lumi-Zone
Viper-X- Strings
NGSS (newguy)
vortex pro extreme 125
deer jamie
Posts: 253
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2008 5:33 pm
Location: stratford

Post by deer jamie »

i also have a nikon and it works great my model has incline? dont know how useful that feature is but if a range finder gets you withen a few feet that better the any human can guesstamate!!!! :shock:
bbbwb
Posts: 435
Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2007 11:12 am
Location: London, Ontario

Rangefinder

Post by bbbwb »

This is slight overkill at this point but I have had a Bushnell Yardage Pro 450 for 4 + years and I like it fine. Plan to buy my daughter one.

bbbwb
Post Reply