Mecanical Broadheads (FOC's) Suck!

Crossbow Hunting

Moderator: Excalibur Marketing Dude

User avatar
Kegbelly
Posts: 1639
Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2013 8:04 pm

Re: Mecanical Broadheads (FOC's) Suck!

Post by Kegbelly »

Cevans are these the correct pics?
Image
Image
Matrix 380
18" Zombies, 400 gr w/ 125 gr Magnus Stingers & Lumenoks
Exomag
20" Zombies, 380 gr w/ 100 gr Magnus Stingers
User avatar
Peacemaker
Posts: 220
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2012 5:58 am

Re: Mecanical Broadheads (FOC's) Suck!

Post by Peacemaker »

I have been using rage mechanicals that have never failed to open. I had an inexplicable miss on my first use in 2012....which I blamed on premature opening so since them I have banded them with dental rubber bands. Never a miss, and never a failure to open, since. Any bad shots were clearly operator error; though I would like to blame the equipment, I can't.
Tom
Posts: 2640
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 8:43 pm
Location: Ontario Canada
Contact:

Re: Mecanical Broadheads (FOC's) Suck!

Post by Tom »

If that is the exit hole, then, in my opinion, the blades all opened from the size of hole. If the blades did not open, the hole would only be the size of your little finger, not what looks like a hole you could put your thumb into.

Without having a complete pass through, the KE from the arrow stopping would close the blades. If the blade tracks are completly clean, then I would say they might not have opened, but I would think the tracks would have debree in it.

As for the tracking required, any hit which is back, can easily require longer tracking. Many will not shoot at a moving or walking deer (I will take the shot if conditions are correct) just because the time it takes for the arrow to get to the deer after it is shot. The point of impact will change.

Tom
Tom
[img]http://hometown.aol.com/wingbonecall/images/turkey.gif[/img]
User avatar
wabi
Posts: 13443
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 9:21 pm
Location: Ohio

Re: Mecanical Broadheads (FOC's) Suck!

Post by wabi »

Congratulations on recovering the buck!!!!!!!

I had a mechanical (Wasp JakHammer) fail to open on one several years ago. I did recover him (heart shot), but I went back to fixed blades after that experience.
wabi
User avatar
cevans
Posts: 404
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2011 8:14 pm
Location: Southern Indiana

Re: Mecanical Broadheads (FOC's) Suck!

Post by cevans »

You peeps take it for all you want. Call me a liar,,I really don't give a rats ass. The blades didn't open. This is the end of this. Done with this post. Stuff it. I am back to fixed and enjoy your mechanicals.
Exomax w/S 5
Varizone
BE 20" Zombies
Slick Trick 100's

Stalking is the game! Stand Hunt too.
paulaboutform
Posts: 4970
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2013 11:32 pm
Location: Coquitlam, British Columbia

Re: Mecanical Broadheads (FOC's) Suck!

Post by paulaboutform »

I haven't shot expandable broadheads out of my crossbow but I've tried a number of them with my compounds. I used them because of their accuracy and my lack of understanding about bow tuning at the time. I did have good success with rocket steelheads but had bad results from spitfires and the worst was the rage 3 blade. The young boar I heart shot looked like the deer cevans shot. I had a 7/8" hole from entry, through the heart, and exit. It also failed to open but I did recover the pig as it died within five steps toward me. Cevans, I understand your frustration so I hope you don't feel attacked. Each to their own and I hope the mechanical fans have continued success with them. My thought is that if I can achieve field point accuracy with my fixed blades with no chance of mechanical failure that's the route I choose. Besides, when I'm coring animals with five inches of cutting surface with a deadly accurate fixed blade head that works for me. :wink:
You're only paranoid if everyone isn't out to get you.
Keep your friends close and your enemies closer.
My enemy's friend is also my enemy.
Tom
Posts: 2640
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 8:43 pm
Location: Ontario Canada
Contact:

Re: Mecanical Broadheads (FOC's) Suck!

Post by Tom »

cevans wrote:You peeps take it for all you want. Call me a liar,,I really don't give a rats ass. The blades didn't open. This is the end of this. Done with this post. Stuff it. I am back to fixed and enjoy your mechanicals.
cevans your response is uncalled for. I never called you a liar, nor do I believe anyone else did.

Mechanical heads are not for everyone. The do require maintance and care. If you do not look after and take care of a mechanical head, then you will probbally have failures.

I like mechanicals because there is less wondering in the point of impact caused by wind like I found with the larger cutting surface fixed heads.

Again, a head which does not open only punches a small hole, not something you could put your thumb into.

Tom
Tom
[img]http://hometown.aol.com/wingbonecall/images/turkey.gif[/img]
vixenmaster
Posts: 13618
Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2005 3:51 pm
Location: Western Ky

Re: Mecanical Broadheads (FOC's) Suck!

Post by vixenmaster »

cevans, i can understand yer frustration about the BH & the way you feel it failed. Chalk it up to a learned lesson as you did recover the deer. Now yer path forward is to decide which fixed blade BH you want or either go back to or try? I have half dz or more BH's i am jus usin up weedin thru testing what ever you wish to call it. Hey mech. are not fer everyone. I don't mind usin them but i have an Ace in the hole, me furbabies blood trail them.
Half Bubble Off BD360

[email protected] 417-505-9315
macbe
Posts: 8
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2008 7:10 pm
Location: York, PA

Re: Mecanical Broadheads (FOC's) Suck!

Post by macbe »

Tom wrote:If that is the exit hole, then, in my opinion, the blades all opened from the size of hole. If the blades did not open, the hole would only be the size of your little finger, not what looks like a hole you could put your thumb into.

Without having a complete pass through, the KE from the arrow stopping would close the blades. If the blade tracks are completly clean, then I would say they might not have opened, but I would think the tracks would have debree in it.

As for the tracking required, any hit which is back, can easily require longer tracking. Many will not shoot at a moving or walking deer (I will take the shot if conditions are correct) just because the time it takes for the arrow to get to the deer after it is shot. The point of impact will change.

Tom
that cannot be the right picture,that looks like a neck shot
he said he it liver
User avatar
Kegbelly
Posts: 1639
Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2013 8:04 pm

Re: Mecanical Broadheads (FOC's) Suck!

Post by Kegbelly »

macbe wrote:
Tom wrote:If that is the exit hole, then, in my opinion, the blades all opened from the size of hole. If the blades did not open, the hole would only be the size of your little finger, not what looks like a hole you could put your thumb into.

Without having a complete pass through, the KE from the arrow stopping would close the blades. If the blade tracks are completly clean, then I would say they might not have opened, but I would think the tracks would have debree in it.

As for the tracking required, any hit which is back, can easily require longer tracking. Many will not shoot at a moving or walking deer (I will take the shot if conditions are correct) just because the time it takes for the arrow to get to the deer after it is shot. The point of impact will change.

Tom
that cannot be the right picture,that looks like a neck shot
he said he it liver
I asked if these were the correct pictures but got no reply....let's make sure we're looking at the right images before we go getting all testy :oops:
Matrix 380
18" Zombies, 400 gr w/ 125 gr Magnus Stingers & Lumenoks
Exomag
20" Zombies, 380 gr w/ 100 gr Magnus Stingers
flightattendant100
Posts: 4805
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2009 5:06 pm
Location: Ft. Worth, Texas

Re: Mecanical Broadheads (FOC's) Suck!

Post by flightattendant100 »

He aint gonna get splinters ridin' the fence is he? :lol:
PA_DeerHunter
Posts: 177
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 9:22 pm

Re: Mecanical Broadheads (FOC's) Suck!

Post by PA_DeerHunter »

The OP said that he heard a loud "kawhack" when the arrow hit the deer. This "kawhack" is typical of this type of broadhead WHEN it deploys. The "Kawhack" you hear are the blades slamming open onto the back of the ferrule. You don't hear a "kawhack" from a field point or fixed blade broadhead.

And a liver-shot deer can and will run a long way. 300 yards is not out of the question. Iv'e seen rifle shot deer (liver hits) run farther.

As another poster has said, an arrow that doesn't pass completely through a deer will come to a screeching halt. That yours did so after passing through the far side of the deer means that those blades would have slammed closed, giving the appearance that the blades never deployed.

If you're going to slam a broadhead for failing to open, then at least provide a clear picture of the exit hole to show everyone that the blades never opened. Bad luck may not always be as bad as we think. I say those blades opened, and the "kawhack" is the evidence. A broadhead that is closed is valid evidence IF the exit wound is the same size as the entrance wound.
User avatar
nchunterkw
Posts: 2904
Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2011 11:21 am
Location: Wake Forest, NC
Contact:

Re: Mecanical Broadheads (FOC's) Suck!

Post by nchunterkw »

[quote="paulaboutform"]My thought is that if I can achieve field point accuracy with my fixed blades with no chance of mechanical failure that's the route I choose. quote]

Couldn't have said it better.

Tom,
I have to disagree that a little bit of wind is going to cause a fixed blade to fly off POI. They are already moving ~300fps. Something in the alignment or the arrow setup causes that. And it is also my opinion that the small hole an undeployed FOC would make in a target would look much bigger in a live animal. The skin stretches etc. All my Slick Trick holes are much bigger than the BH diameter because of this.
Keith
Stand by the roads and look, and ask for the ancient paths; where the good way is,
and walk in it and find rest for your souls. - Jer 6:16

Micro 335 & 355
deerboyarchery.wixsite.com/trinitystrings
[email protected]
<{{{><
mingle
Posts: 78
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2012 9:27 am
Location: SE michigan

Re: Mecanical Broadheads (FOC's) Suck!

Post by mingle »

wabi wrote:Congratulations on recovering the buck!!!!!!!

I had a mechanical (Wasp JakHammer) fail to open on one several years ago. I did recover him (heart shot), but I went back to fixed blades after that experience.
Been using jak hammers along time always worked for me with vertical bow,Shot a doe this year with my excal and a jak hammer with 2 bands and it worked well.I was told 2 use 2 o rings buy wasp so I did was wondering if just1 would be better,my xbow shoots about 350 fps..
Tom
Posts: 2640
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 8:43 pm
Location: Ontario Canada
Contact:

Re: Mecanical Broadheads (FOC's) Suck!

Post by Tom »

nchunterkw wrote:
paulaboutform wrote:My thought is that if I can achieve field point accuracy with my fixed blades with no chance of mechanical failure that's the route I choose. quote]

Couldn't have said it better.

Tom,
I have to disagree that a little bit of wind is going to cause a fixed blade to fly off POI. They are already moving ~300fps. Something in the alignment or the arrow setup causes that. And it is also my opinion that the small hole an undeployed FOC would make in a target would look much bigger in a live animal. The skin stretches etc. All my Slick Trick holes are much bigger than the BH diameter because of this.
A cross wind WILL AFFECT the POI with a larger cutting surface head. The fixed blades will act as wings and catch air. The more of a cross wind, causes more of an Affect on the POI.

I really noticed this problem when I started turkey hunting with the bow. You need to be more accurate as the target area is smaller. My setup was pretty good as I have on more then one occasion demistrated the accuracy of my bow out to 60 yards. And this shooting was not off a bench, it was from what I call chair shooting as I might shoot when hunting.

Tom
Tom
[img]http://hometown.aol.com/wingbonecall/images/turkey.gif[/img]
Post Reply