ive got that same one and its beautiful. I had a cheaper range finder and it got screwed up when ever it snowed or rained so i got this one and its not effected by it at all! How much are you getting it for and where?
It doesn't have all the "bells & whistles" like scan & zip modes, but for most hunting situations it works fine. Heavy rain/snow or a lot of foreground clutter (brush) can make readings difficult, but if you have time to use a rangefinder, you can double check readings to be sure they're correct.
I've had a couple of Bushnell rangefinders, they work ok, but I really prefer the Lieca that I have now, much better optics. I don't even carry my pocket bino's anymore, I just use the Lieca.
But then the guys I work with call me an optics snob.
I purchased one of the original models when it came out ( mid 90's ) it worked great . It just died out last year, i think my son dropped it . Bought the base model Bushnell to replace it . For Bow hunting it should be ok . For Busting Groundhogs and other varmits it is not doing the job for me .
huntin1 wrote:I've had a couple of Bushnell rangefinders, they work ok, but I really prefer the Lieca that I have now, much better optics. I don't even carry my pocket bino's anymore, I just use the Lieca.
........
huntin1
I agree completely. The Leica becomes a much better deal financially if you would be getting both pocket binos AND a rangefinder, because the Leica can do both jobs for one price.
The Leica has far better dim light capability, so if you are ranging in dim light, they are the better deal. The Leica has better "light gathering" and better sights for targeting onto the object you want to range.
You have to use sights to line up your rangefinder on target. The Leica sight dims down to let you see your target in low light. The Bushnell sight has one brightness setting, and it is so bright that in dim light I couldn't see the target I wanted to range.
"Gun Control Laws"--trying to nag criminals into submission.
it seems to me that you would be using a rangefinder when you were actually going to shoot-which would be well within 60yards,so having a rangefinder with a capability of 10x that is redundant.I have been considering getting one-not for the long distances-but determining accurately whether a deer is 40 yards a away-or 50,due to the trajectory starting to drop significantly at that range.If the Bushnell Yardage Pro can do that-I would get one