I didn't mean for my post to sound like I am OK with a 40 yard neck shot. I know two archers that shoot quail on the fly and are deadly shots. If either of these guys came in with a deer that was shot in the neck at 40 yards, then I would say nice shot and leave it at that because I know their skill level and I know these guys would not take a shot that they were not going to make a quick kill.macobow wrote:Sumner, with all due respect, I disagree with you. An expert marksman with a rifle doing a neck shot at 40 yards might be OK, but not with an arrow or xbow bolt. If the deer reacts even slightly at the sound of the shot the result would be a wounded deer. We have a duty to the animal as well as ourselves to not take risky shots. I'm glad Wabi brought up this topic.
I can also add that neither of these guys has ever taken a deer from more than 30 yards and never a neck shot. At least not that they have told the story.
I'm just trying to make the point that we can not judge by pictures alone.
I also disagree with your accessment of a 40 yard neck shot. If the deer reacts at all, it's probably a clean miss. Taking a neck shot is nothing more than trying to show off. Probably over compensating for something.
I really agree with wabi . . .some shots should never be taken. But, unless you know more information, then it's not right to judge.
Sopchoppy has every right to be pissed at his hunting partner. He has the facts.